A Man As soon as Sued Himself After He Backed Into His Personal Automobile


Regardless of how a lot we love them, automobiles make individuals do dumb issues. Whether or not it’s willingly overpaying for them to being clueless whereas driving, automobiles can have an effect on judgment within the worst methods. Automobile accidents can actually deliver out the dumb in individuals. Take the person who tried to sue himself after a collision on this unusual story I got here throughout from practically 20 years in the past.

Curtis Gokey was each a resident and dump truck driver with the town of Lodi, California, a small northern California metropolis simply outdoors of Stockton. Based on Gokey’s spouse Rhonda, throughout a winter storm that December, Gokey backed the dump truck into his privately owned car, inflicting injury.

Apparently Gokey’s insurance coverage wouldn’t cowl the injury as a result of not lengthy after, he filed a declare with the town for $3,600 in injury to his car — a car that was in each he and his spouse’s identify. He even admitted to the town that the accident was his fault, but he nonetheless filed the declare. Let me reiterate that when you didn’t catch what’s occurring right here: this man backed into his personal car with a metropolis truck that he was driving and anticipated the town to foot the invoice for the injury. It will get higher.

The town denied the declare after all for apparent causes: you may’t sue your self. So, considering that she was intelligent or one thing, Rhonda Gokey determined to file one other declare, however this time the declare would simply have her identify, not her husbands. Her reasoning was that the town denied her husband’s declare as a result of he’s the one which prompted the accident. Placing her identify on a brand new declare would get rid of “her husband’s alleged battle of curiosity” because the Lodi Information described. She additionally elevated the injury quantity to $4,800, saying “I’ve the suitable to sue the town as a result of a metropolis’s car broken my non-public car.” She continued, virtually threateningly. “I’m not as good as my husband is. I’m entitled to a alternative car and insurance coverage for the car.” Okay woman.

After all her declare was thrown out too. Lodi Metropolis Lawyer Steve Schwabauer basically mentioned the declare was dumb, particularly since Curtis had admitted he was accountable for the accident to start with. And bear in mind, California is a neighborhood property state; what’s mine is yours and all that. Schwabauer pointed this out to NBC Information on the time.

You’ll be able to sue your partner for divorce, however you may’t sue your partner for negligence. They’re a married couple beneath California regulation. They’re one entity. It’s injury to neighborhood property.

So if ever end up so incompetent and entitled that you just’d attempt to sue your self to get another person to pay for car injury you known as, assume twice earlier than you do. You’ll most likely find yourself nonetheless being talked about and laughed at practically 20 years later.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *